Court to set aside this column's last 2 of 3 successful state Office of Open Records
appeals to obtain information that the County denied under the Right To Know Law.
Could it be that no Commonwealth judge wants to set aside a state OOR decision?
Could it be no judge wants to have to ask why the County gave sworn affidavits to
the OOR that the information didn't exist, although previously obtained RTK answers
proved that the County did have the information? Could it be no judge wants to
open that can of Perjury Worms?
Could it be that the County parked the matter in "legal" limbo by filing in
Commonwealth Court to set aside the OOR rulings until this column likewise files to
dismiss the County's cowardly filed petition? Could it be all of the above? jt